I guess we have all hear numerous statements about buildings and houses.
A man's home is his castle.
There is no place like home.
Buildings, too, are children of Earth and Sun - Architect, Frank Lloyd Wright
A building has integrity just like a man. And just as seldom Novelist, Ann Rand
The only thing that we have to be careful about is to have restraint and to have sensitive and serene buildings - Japanese architect, Minoru Yamasaki
I am sure there are many additional quotes about buildings and houses from all parts of the world. But today, in the news, the primary thing we hear about housing is that we are currently in a housing bubble and that at some time in the future, we are going to see it pop, just as the internet bubble did.
Well, I am not sure about a housing bubble and I am not sure about whether it will pop or not. Only time will tell. But even though people like to equate the current escalation of housing prices with the dramatic run-up of internet stock prices in the late 1990s, there is a clear difference between stocks and houses.
We don't live in stocks, we live in houses. I think most of us have heard the statement that, for the vast majority of people their home is by far their most valuable asset. In fact, because of the beneficial tax breaks afforded housing over the years (mortgage interest deductions) houses in
Since a person's house is likely their most valuable asset should not the buying of one's house deserve the utmost care and consideration? The answer to this question is certainly a resoundingyes!
This brings me to the primary focus of this article - Zero Energy Homes (ZEH).
My definition of a ZEH is a home that is built with integrity and with sensitivity to its inhabitants and utilizes proven building techniques to maximize the benefit of solar energy and energy efficiency. So, in a way, I guess you could say it was a child of the Earth and the Sun.
But since most people are really interested in the monetary benefit to them, let's shift the focus and look at the numbers to see what they tell us about a ZEH verses a more conventional home. After all, this is probably going to be the most important money related decision in most people's life and it should be carefully considered.
Let's take a concrete example and compare the cost and benefits of a conventional home and a ZEH.
Comparison Assumptions:
Both homes will be newly built homes.
Each home will have a 30 year, 6.5% mortgage with 10 percent down.
The ZEH will cost more due to incorporation of solar electric generation (photovoltaics), solar thermal and numerous energy efficient building techniques such as passive solar building design.
ZEH benefits that will be included will be: current tax credits, energy savings (3% annual increase in energy costs), superior price appreciation based upon a recent
ZEH benefits NOT included will be: any interest earned on the tax credit refund, any decrease in mortgage rate that may be afforded to a energy efficient home, the positive environment impact of less fossil fuel burned, additional comfort level afforded by ZEH building techniques, personal satisfaction of owner knowing he is making a positive contribution to the environment and setting a positive example for others and his children.
Comparison Data
Initial Cost:Conventional Home - $400,000, ZEH - $450,000
The ZEH will have approximately $4,176 more per year in mortgage payments
The ZEH will have $5,000 more in initial down-payment.
The ZEH home will be able to receive approximately 60% of the additional cost back in the form of a tax credit.
According to a
For the purposed of this illustration we will assume the 2003 number of 20% and assign a 5% annual appreciation to the conventional home and a 6% annual appreciation to the ZEH.
Comparison Results after 5 years * - Conventional Home vs ZEH
$20,880 more in mortgage payments for ZEH
$5,000 more in down payment for ZEH
Total benefit of a ZEH over a Conventional Home: $69,392.00
Conclusion
The results are clear. It is almost $70,000 better financially to build a $450,000 ZEH than to build a $400,000 conventionally built home over a five year period or over any period of time for that matter.
Given these clear cut financial numbers, which I feel are conservative and do not include a number of factors which could make the advantage even greater (lower preferential mortgage rate, a more rapid rise in energy prices, the possibility of temporary oil shortages and the possibility that the price of an energy inefficient conventional home may actually decreasing in an environment of rapidly escalating energy prices).
From a purely financial perspective it makes no sense to build a standard conventional home rather than a ZEH. In fact, on a national level, from a financial and national security perspective, all homes in the future should be constructed as Zero Energy Homes (ZEH).
Notes:
Note:After the initial period of 5 years the benefit of the ZEH over the conventional home only gets larger as energy prices continue to rise and the resale value of a conventional home may, in fact, decline in value due to the excess amount of energy needed to heat, cool and power the house.
** Note: Conventional home = $400,000 at 5% appreciation over 5 years equals $510,000 = a gain of $110,000.
ZEH Home = $450,000 at 6% appreciation over 5 years equals $602,000 = a gain of $152,000.
ZEH price appreciation advantage = $152,000 - $110,000 = $42,000.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Peter Lynch has worked, for 28 years as a Wall Street analyst, an independent equity analyst and private investor, and a merchant banker in small emerging technology companies. He has been actively involved in following developments in the renewable energy sector since 1977. He is currently a financial and technology consultant to a number of companies. He can be reached via e-mail at Solarjpl@aol.com.
©2003-2008 New England Cedar Homes Toll Free: 800 998 6132. All Rights Reserved
Use of this website and information available from it is subject
to our Legal Notice and Disclaimer